<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 7 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, restricting the penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 to Rs. 5,000, in line with legal precedents. The decision emphasized that penalties should be limited to cases where there is intent to evade payment and considered financial constraints. The ruling aligned with the interpretation of Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, ensuring consistency in penalty imposition for defaults in Central Excise duty payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 10:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 7 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, restricting the penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 to Rs. 5,000, in line with legal precedents. The decision emphasized that penalties should be limited to cases where there is intent to evade payment and considered financial constraints. The ruling aligned with the interpretation of Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, ensuring consistency in penalty imposition for defaults in Central Excise duty payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>