<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 6 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244549</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit is admissible on inputs used for trial run and testing of capital goods, as the issue was treated as settled by binding Supreme Court precedent on credit for trial and testing inputs. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected and the availability of credit was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 10:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 6 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244549</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit is admissible on inputs used for trial run and testing of capital goods, as the issue was treated as settled by binding Supreme Court precedent on credit for trial and testing inputs. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected and the availability of credit was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>