<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 5 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244548</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of credit on CHA service, telephone service, insurance charges, repair and maintenance of the factory, and courier service, along with associated penalties. However, the denial of credit on repair of motor vehicles was upheld due to the lack of connection with the manufacturing process. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 10:15:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 5 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244548</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of credit on CHA service, telephone service, insurance charges, repair and maintenance of the factory, and courier service, along with associated penalties. However, the denial of credit on repair of motor vehicles was upheld due to the lack of connection with the manufacturing process. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>