<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 2 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244545</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to take credit on endorsed invoices for transfers between sister units of the same entity. The judgment clarified the eligibility of appellants to claim such credit, emphasizing specific circumstances and precedents supporting their claims. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with necessary consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 10:12:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 2 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244545</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to take credit on endorsed invoices for transfers between sister units of the same entity. The judgment clarified the eligibility of appellants to claim such credit, emphasizing specific circumstances and precedents supporting their claims. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with necessary consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>