https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162506 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is not excluded by an alternative statutory remedy, but courts apply a self-imposed restraint and ordinarily decline writ relief where an efficacious appeal exists. Interference is justified only for lack of inherent jurisdiction, breach of fundamental rights, challenge to vires, or a clear natural justice violation on the face of the record. Where the alleged denial of natural justice turns on disputed facts, the statutory appellate forum is the proper venue. In intra-court review, interference with the single judge's discretionary refusal is unwarranted unless that discretion is shown to be illegal or perverse. The writ appeal failed, and the refusal to entertain the writ petitions was upheld. en-us Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162506 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is not excluded by an alternative statutory remedy, but courts apply a self-imposed restraint and ordinarily decline writ relief where an efficacious appeal exists. Interference is justified only for lack of inherent jurisdiction, breach of fundamental rights, challenge to vires, or a clear natural justice violation on the face of the record. Where the alleged denial of natural justice turns on disputed facts, the statutory appellate forum is the proper venue. In intra-court review, interference with the single judge's discretionary refusal is unwarranted unless that discretion is shown to be illegal or perverse. The writ appeal failed, and the refusal to entertain the writ petitions was upheld. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162506