<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 500 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162504</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the impugned order passed by the Haryana Tax Tribunal due to the composition of the Bench, which included a member who had previously acted as the revisional authority in the case. The Court emphasized the importance of propriety and recusal, directing the Tribunal to rehear the matter considering the petitioner&#039;s objections. The Court highlighted the need for a fair and unbiased adjudication, leading to the disposal of the writ petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:24:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 500 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162504</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the impugned order passed by the Haryana Tax Tribunal due to the composition of the Bench, which included a member who had previously acted as the revisional authority in the case. The Court emphasized the importance of propriety and recusal, directing the Tribunal to rehear the matter considering the petitioner&#039;s objections. The Court highlighted the need for a fair and unbiased adjudication, leading to the disposal of the writ petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>