<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 532 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162496</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a registered society, determining that their services, primarily in scientific/engineering matters, did not constitute Management Consultancy Service. Despite the Commissioner&#039;s contrary view, the Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s technical services focused on process improvement and quality standards, rather than traditional consultancy activities. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of aligning advice with the definition of Management Consultancy and granted the stay application, waiving the pre-deposit requirement. This case underscores the importance of precise delineation between technical services and Management Consultancy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 532 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162496</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a registered society, determining that their services, primarily in scientific/engineering matters, did not constitute Management Consultancy Service. Despite the Commissioner&#039;s contrary view, the Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s technical services focused on process improvement and quality standards, rather than traditional consultancy activities. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of aligning advice with the definition of Management Consultancy and granted the stay application, waiving the pre-deposit requirement. This case underscores the importance of precise delineation between technical services and Management Consultancy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>