<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 481 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reduction of penalty imposed on the appellants under section 76, citing the applicability of an amnesty scheme introduced by the Government. Relying on relevant case law, the Tribunal found that those who paid tax and interest before a specified date were not liable for penalty. The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, following the precedent set in the case of Bharat Security Services, and nullified the penalty imposed on the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:07:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 481 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reduction of penalty imposed on the appellants under section 76, citing the applicability of an amnesty scheme introduced by the Government. Relying on relevant case law, the Tribunal found that those who paid tax and interest before a specified date were not liable for penalty. The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, following the precedent set in the case of Bharat Security Services, and nullified the penalty imposed on the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>