<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1095 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162488</link>
    <description>Abduction attracts Section 364 IPC when the proved circumstances show that the victim was forcibly taken away with an express or inferred intent to kill; repeated pursuit, threats to finish the victim, and the FIR version supported that inference here. Circumstantial evidence also established homicidal death and participation in murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC: the victim was last seen in the accused&#039;s custody, the body was found shortly afterwards with multiple injuries, the accused gave no explanation for events within their special knowledge, and recovery of the victim&#039;s shirt strengthened the prosecution case. The conviction under Sections 364 and 302 read with Section 34 was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1095 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162488</link>
      <description>Abduction attracts Section 364 IPC when the proved circumstances show that the victim was forcibly taken away with an express or inferred intent to kill; repeated pursuit, threats to finish the victim, and the FIR version supported that inference here. Circumstantial evidence also established homicidal death and participation in murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC: the victim was last seen in the accused&#039;s custody, the body was found shortly afterwards with multiple injuries, the accused gave no explanation for events within their special knowledge, and recovery of the victim&#039;s shirt strengthened the prosecution case. The conviction under Sections 364 and 302 read with Section 34 was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>