<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1134 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244540</link>
    <description>A petitioner who missed the deadline to object to a demand notice was granted a further opportunity to submit objections and supporting documents before the revised assessment was finalised. The assessing authority was directed to afford a personal hearing, verify the documents, and consider the objections in accordance with law. The impugned proceedings were kept in status quo until that exercise was completed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1134 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244540</link>
      <description>A petitioner who missed the deadline to object to a demand notice was granted a further opportunity to submit objections and supporting documents before the revised assessment was finalised. The assessing authority was directed to afford a personal hearing, verify the documents, and consider the objections in accordance with law. The impugned proceedings were kept in status quo until that exercise was completed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>