<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1124 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244530</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld deletion of the addition made under s. 68 of the IT Act for alleged unexplained credits. It held that the assessee had discharged the statutory onus by producing contemporaneous documentary evidence establishing the identity and creditworthiness of the contributors and the genuineness of the transactions, including share application forms, bank statements, income tax returns, and balance sheets. Applying the principle in Lovely Exports, the Court found that sufficiency of such material is a factual determination and, since the appellate authorities concurrently found the onus satisfied, no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1124 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244530</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld deletion of the addition made under s. 68 of the IT Act for alleged unexplained credits. It held that the assessee had discharged the statutory onus by producing contemporaneous documentary evidence establishing the identity and creditworthiness of the contributors and the genuineness of the transactions, including share application forms, bank statements, income tax returns, and balance sheets. Applying the principle in Lovely Exports, the Court found that sufficiency of such material is a factual determination and, since the appellate authorities concurrently found the onus satisfied, no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>