<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1120 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244526</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, citing a precedent from a previous case involving the same party where a similar issue was decided against the revenue. The Court emphasized the importance of consistency in interpreting tax laws and following precedents. The decision underscores the necessity for tax authorities to apply established legal principles and past judgments for fair outcomes in tax assessments and disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:01:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1120 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244526</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, citing a precedent from a previous case involving the same party where a similar issue was decided against the revenue. The Court emphasized the importance of consistency in interpreting tax laws and following precedents. The decision underscores the necessity for tax authorities to apply established legal principles and past judgments for fair outcomes in tax assessments and disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>