<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1108 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244514</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the assessee, as a partner in a partnership firm, cannot set off the firm&#039;s unabsorbed depreciation against his individual income under section 70(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decisions. The judgment clarified that partnership firm profits are taxed at the firm level, not at the individual partner level. The order was pronounced on 19th February 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:57:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1108 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244514</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the assessee, as a partner in a partnership firm, cannot set off the firm&#039;s unabsorbed depreciation against his individual income under section 70(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decisions. The judgment clarified that partnership firm profits are taxed at the firm level, not at the individual partner level. The order was pronounced on 19th February 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>