https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244509 The Tribunal held that the appellant, Shri Anil Sharma, who qualified as a licensee under CHALR, 1984, could retain this status despite his partner's retirement. The authority's decision questioning Sharma's eligibility under CHALR, 2004 was deemed invalid. Emphasizing procedural fairness, the Tribunal ordered the immediate restoration of Sharma's license unless valid grounds for incompetence were proven. The decision stressed adherence to legal requirements and due process in challenging qualifications, directing the authority to issue Sharma's license in compliance with the law and the Tribunal's findings. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244509 The Tribunal held that the appellant, Shri Anil Sharma, who qualified as a licensee under CHALR, 1984, could retain this status despite his partner's retirement. The authority's decision questioning Sharma's eligibility under CHALR, 2004 was deemed invalid. Emphasizing procedural fairness, the Tribunal ordered the immediate restoration of Sharma's license unless valid grounds for incompetence were proven. The decision stressed adherence to legal requirements and due process in challenging qualifications, directing the authority to issue Sharma's license in compliance with the law and the Tribunal's findings. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244509