https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244508 Lodgement of a caveat under Section 148-A CPC creates a right to notice, but failure to serve that notice does not by itself render the resulting order void or a nullity, especially where no adverse order is shown and no special prejudice is established. The text also states that a writ petition will ordinarily not be entertained where Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 provides an efficacious statutory remedy, and the existence of that remedy justifies refusal to invoke writ jurisdiction or convert the matter into an appeal. It further notes that a judicial member of the CLB need not be impleaded for a judicial act of the tribunal. en-us Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244508 Lodgement of a caveat under Section 148-A CPC creates a right to notice, but failure to serve that notice does not by itself render the resulting order void or a nullity, especially where no adverse order is shown and no special prejudice is established. The text also states that a writ petition will ordinarily not be entertained where Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 provides an efficacious statutory remedy, and the existence of that remedy justifies refusal to invoke writ jurisdiction or convert the matter into an appeal. It further notes that a judicial member of the CLB need not be impleaded for a judicial act of the tribunal. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244508