<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1094 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244500</link>
    <description>Clubbing of clearances to deny small-scale exemption requires evidence of mutuality of interest or financial interdependence; separate registration, distinct locations, and independent resources weigh against aggregation. Mere family relationship or occasional assistance between proprietors is insufficient. The article also notes that clandestine manufacture and removal allegations must be proved with positive corroborative evidence, such as material on production, diversion, buyers, employees, raw material flow, or power consumption. Invoice descriptions, ledger entries, and retracted statements alone do not establish duty evasion or justify confiscation and related demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1094 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244500</link>
      <description>Clubbing of clearances to deny small-scale exemption requires evidence of mutuality of interest or financial interdependence; separate registration, distinct locations, and independent resources weigh against aggregation. Mere family relationship or occasional assistance between proprietors is insufficient. The article also notes that clandestine manufacture and removal allegations must be proved with positive corroborative evidence, such as material on production, diversion, buyers, employees, raw material flow, or power consumption. Invoice descriptions, ledger entries, and retracted statements alone do not establish duty evasion or justify confiscation and related demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>