<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1094 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244500</link>
    <description>Clubbing of excise clearances requires evidence of mutuality of interest or substantive financial and operational interdependence; family relationship, separate assistance, or common proprietorship alone is insufficient. Separate registration, locations, and financial resources weigh against treating units as a facade, particularly where units proposed for aggregation were not given notice. Clandestine manufacture and removal allegations require positive, corroborated evidence of production, raw-material use, power consumption, buyers, or removals. Invoice descriptions, ledger entries, and uncorroborated retracted statements do not by themselves establish duty evasion. The duty demands, penalties, and confiscation components unsupported by such evidence were unsustainable, subject to portions expressly sustained in the majority disposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1094 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244500</link>
      <description>Clubbing of excise clearances requires evidence of mutuality of interest or substantive financial and operational interdependence; family relationship, separate assistance, or common proprietorship alone is insufficient. Separate registration, locations, and financial resources weigh against treating units as a facade, particularly where units proposed for aggregation were not given notice. Clandestine manufacture and removal allegations require positive, corroborated evidence of production, raw-material use, power consumption, buyers, or removals. Invoice descriptions, ledger entries, and uncorroborated retracted statements do not by themselves establish duty evasion. The duty demands, penalties, and confiscation components unsupported by such evidence were unsustainable, subject to portions expressly sustained in the majority disposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>