<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 959 - HOUSE OF LORDS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162478</link>
    <description>VAT treatment of a mixed transaction turns on the arrangement&#039;s essential character in economic reality, not on an artificial splitting of its components. Where a card protection plan was designed primarily to provide financial protection against loss from card misuse or theft, the insurance cover was the dominant supply. Registration, notification, replacement, and assistance services were merely ancillary incidents that enabled better enjoyment of the principal protection and did not constitute independent aims. The entire arrangement therefore took the character of a single exempt insurance supply, with the ancillary elements sharing that exempt treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 959 - HOUSE OF LORDS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162478</link>
      <description>VAT treatment of a mixed transaction turns on the arrangement&#039;s essential character in economic reality, not on an artificial splitting of its components. Where a card protection plan was designed primarily to provide financial protection against loss from card misuse or theft, the insurance cover was the dominant supply. Registration, notification, replacement, and assistance services were merely ancillary incidents that enabled better enjoyment of the principal protection and did not constitute independent aims. The entire arrangement therefore took the character of a single exempt insurance supply, with the ancillary elements sharing that exempt treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>