https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162475 The Court upheld the 1963 seniority list for Appraisers, finding the rotational system compliant with Article 16(1) of the Constitution. However, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioners regarding the seniority of Principal Appraisers, deeming the current system discriminatory. It directed that seniority for Principal Appraisers should be based on continuous service in the grade, irrespective of recruitment source. The petition was partially allowed, with no costs awarded. en-us Mon, 14 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162475 The Court upheld the 1963 seniority list for Appraisers, finding the rotational system compliant with Article 16(1) of the Constitution. However, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioners regarding the seniority of Principal Appraisers, deeming the current system discriminatory. It directed that seniority for Principal Appraisers should be based on continuous service in the grade, irrespective of recruitment source. The petition was partially allowed, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 14 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162475