<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 531 - HOUSE OF LORDS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162472</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of F.A.D./Express in the case. It was established that their business involved supplying goods to non-taxable persons for retail, the Commissioners&#039; Direction applied to their supply of goods, and this application did not contravene Community law. The appeal was allowed, affirming that F.A.D./Express&#039;s business model complied with the relevant legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:16:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 531 - HOUSE OF LORDS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162472</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of F.A.D./Express in the case. It was established that their business involved supplying goods to non-taxable persons for retail, the Commissioners&#039; Direction applied to their supply of goods, and this application did not contravene Community law. The appeal was allowed, affirming that F.A.D./Express&#039;s business model complied with the relevant legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>