<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1367 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162469</link>
    <description>The court set aside the deferment orders dated December 3, 1998, and the order of the learned single Judge, restraining the respondents from making any assessment due to the expiration of the limitation period. The appellant was still liable to pay the admitted tax as per the returns. The writ appeals were allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:40:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1367 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162469</link>
      <description>The court set aside the deferment orders dated December 3, 1998, and the order of the learned single Judge, restraining the respondents from making any assessment due to the expiration of the limitation period. The appellant was still liable to pay the admitted tax as per the returns. The writ appeals were allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>