<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 615 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162468</link>
    <description>Sterilisation of raw needles into sterilised needles was treated as a manufacturing or processing activity for sales tax exemption purposes where the exemption notification conditions were otherwise satisfied. The existence of an actual processing unit and regular sterilisation activity was the ative factual basis, and exemption could not be refused on the ground that the finished product fetched only a marginally higher price. The price differential was a commercial matter and was not a criterion stated in the notification. On that reasoning, denial of the exemption was considered unsustainable and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:37:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 615 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162468</link>
      <description>Sterilisation of raw needles into sterilised needles was treated as a manufacturing or processing activity for sales tax exemption purposes where the exemption notification conditions were otherwise satisfied. The existence of an actual processing unit and regular sterilisation activity was the ative factual basis, and exemption could not be refused on the ground that the finished product fetched only a marginally higher price. The price differential was a commercial matter and was not a criterion stated in the notification. On that reasoning, denial of the exemption was considered unsustainable and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>