<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 614 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162466</link>
    <description>The Court held that the eligibility certificate could not be withdrawn solely due to the non-submission of the Change of Land Use Certificate (CLU) along with the application. Emphasizing the mandatory nature of the CLU for the application&#039;s validity, the Court clarified that while the CLU must be submitted during the application process, its non-submission would only impact the grant of the certificate, not its withdrawal. The Court found no merit in the State&#039;s arguments regarding the necessity of the CLU before setting up a new industry and dismissed the State&#039;s contentions. The petition was allowed, and the impugned order was quashed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:33:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 614 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162466</link>
      <description>The Court held that the eligibility certificate could not be withdrawn solely due to the non-submission of the Change of Land Use Certificate (CLU) along with the application. Emphasizing the mandatory nature of the CLU for the application&#039;s validity, the Court clarified that while the CLU must be submitted during the application process, its non-submission would only impact the grant of the certificate, not its withdrawal. The Court found no merit in the State&#039;s arguments regarding the necessity of the CLU before setting up a new industry and dismissed the State&#039;s contentions. The petition was allowed, and the impugned order was quashed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>