<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 1019 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162459</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the tax revision case, affirming the appropriateness of the reassessment under section 14(4) and justifying the penalty under section 14(8) due to wilful suppression of sales turnover. The court held that findings from the assessment proceedings were relevant to the penalty proceedings, as the petitioner did not contest the show cause notice, supporting the penalty&#039;s validity. The petition was dismissed, and the penalty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:57:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 1019 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162459</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the tax revision case, affirming the appropriateness of the reassessment under section 14(4) and justifying the penalty under section 14(8) due to wilful suppression of sales turnover. The court held that findings from the assessment proceedings were relevant to the penalty proceedings, as the petitioner did not contest the show cause notice, supporting the penalty&#039;s validity. The petition was dismissed, and the penalty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>