<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 1019 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162459</link>
    <description>Colourable or fictitious sales and repurchases used to suppress turnover may be disregarded for tax purposes, and the assessing authority may reassess the real taxable turnover on the basis of genuine transactions. Where the transactions are mere book entries between concerns managed by the same person and the finding of wilful suppression is established in the assessment proceedings and remains unrebutted, penalty for suppression is sustainable under the Act. The matter was treated as one of escaped turnover and evasion, not as a case of sale below market price governed only by section 14-B of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The challenge to reassessment and penalty was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:57:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 1019 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162459</link>
      <description>Colourable or fictitious sales and repurchases used to suppress turnover may be disregarded for tax purposes, and the assessing authority may reassess the real taxable turnover on the basis of genuine transactions. Where the transactions are mere book entries between concerns managed by the same person and the finding of wilful suppression is established in the assessment proceedings and remains unrebutted, penalty for suppression is sustainable under the Act. The matter was treated as one of escaped turnover and evasion, not as a case of sale below market price governed only by section 14-B of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The challenge to reassessment and penalty was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>