<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 951 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162451</link>
    <description>The court, in a petition under Article 226, directed the respondents to issue an eligibility certificate to a public limited company for its solvent extraction plant. Despite meeting all requirements, the respondents unlawfully withheld the certificate, potentially subjecting the company to taxes. The court emphasized the binding nature of the notification granting tax exemption to pioneer industries, invoking principles of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation. The judgment mandated the issuance of the certificate within one month, aligning government actions with statutory provisions and upholding the petitioner&#039;s rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:29:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 951 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162451</link>
      <description>The court, in a petition under Article 226, directed the respondents to issue an eligibility certificate to a public limited company for its solvent extraction plant. Despite meeting all requirements, the respondents unlawfully withheld the certificate, potentially subjecting the company to taxes. The court emphasized the binding nature of the notification granting tax exemption to pioneer industries, invoking principles of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation. The judgment mandated the issuance of the certificate within one month, aligning government actions with statutory provisions and upholding the petitioner&#039;s rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>