<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 593 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162446</link>
    <description>Purchases of timber against form 18 under section 5(3) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 do not attract the special purchase tax liability under section 5(1)(v)(a). That liability is confined to purchases made after payment of tax under column (4) of the Fifth Schedule, where the dealer declares the goods for resale in the State through form 25A under rule 32(13C). A dealer who instead avails the concessional rate under section 5(3) through form 18 falls outside that limited scheme. The Commissioner&#039;s clarification extending section 5(1)(v)(a) to such purchases was contrary to the statutory structure and unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:06:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 593 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162446</link>
      <description>Purchases of timber against form 18 under section 5(3) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 do not attract the special purchase tax liability under section 5(1)(v)(a). That liability is confined to purchases made after payment of tax under column (4) of the Fifth Schedule, where the dealer declares the goods for resale in the State through form 25A under rule 32(13C). A dealer who instead avails the concessional rate under section 5(3) through form 18 falls outside that limited scheme. The Commissioner&#039;s clarification extending section 5(1)(v)(a) to such purchases was contrary to the statutory structure and unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>