<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 593 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162446</link>
    <description>The court overturned the Commissioner&#039;s clarification under section 59A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, ruling in favor of the petitioner, a wooden furniture manufacturer. The petitioner successfully challenged the sales tax assessment, arguing that the Commissioner&#039;s interpretation was incorrect and contrary to the statutory scheme. The court held that the petitioner was not liable to pay tax at 2 per cent on the timber purchase turnover under section 5(1)(v)(a) as the concessional rate under section 5(3) applied. The assessment was modified accordingly, and the petitioner&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:06:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 593 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162446</link>
      <description>The court overturned the Commissioner&#039;s clarification under section 59A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, ruling in favor of the petitioner, a wooden furniture manufacturer. The petitioner successfully challenged the sales tax assessment, arguing that the Commissioner&#039;s interpretation was incorrect and contrary to the statutory scheme. The court held that the petitioner was not liable to pay tax at 2 per cent on the timber purchase turnover under section 5(1)(v)(a) as the concessional rate under section 5(3) applied. The assessment was modified accordingly, and the petitioner&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>