<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 754 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162442</link>
    <description>Non-production of the prescribed transport documents before the appropriate officer justified seizure under the West Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1995, because the rules treated such non-compliance as a contravention and authorised seizure without any separate right to a 48-hour period for later production. By contrast, penalty could not be sustained mechanically where the record did not show false representation, an unfair attempt to secure release, or any material establishing a deliberate intention to evade tax. The absence of a proper finding on mens rea required the penalty matter to be reconsidered afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:29:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 754 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162442</link>
      <description>Non-production of the prescribed transport documents before the appropriate officer justified seizure under the West Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1995, because the rules treated such non-compliance as a contravention and authorised seizure without any separate right to a 48-hour period for later production. By contrast, penalty could not be sustained mechanically where the record did not show false representation, an unfair attempt to secure release, or any material establishing a deliberate intention to evade tax. The absence of a proper finding on mens rea required the penalty matter to be reconsidered afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>