<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 687 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162435</link>
    <description>The Allahabad HC dismissed a revision under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, for the year 1980-81. The dealer, manufacturing iron and steel, with a valid recognition certificate, had a valid raw material purchase form. The court held the penalty under section 3-B unjustified, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set it aside. The revision was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:08:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 687 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162435</link>
      <description>The Allahabad HC dismissed a revision under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, for the year 1980-81. The dealer, manufacturing iron and steel, with a valid recognition certificate, had a valid raw material purchase form. The court held the penalty under section 3-B unjustified, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set it aside. The revision was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>