<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 752 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the notices issued in forms 51 and 52, challenging their validity and the penalty imposed under section 76 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994. The dispute arose from the tax rate applied to stainless steel pipes and fittings, with the petitioner arguing they were declared goods taxed at 4%, while the respondent claimed they were taxable at 7%. The Tribunal found the notices invalid as they were not issued during an assessment proceeding as required by section 76, ultimately restraining the respondents from enforcing them. Compliance with procedural requirements and accurate application of tax laws were emphasized in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:48:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 752 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the notices issued in forms 51 and 52, challenging their validity and the penalty imposed under section 76 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994. The dispute arose from the tax rate applied to stainless steel pipes and fittings, with the petitioner arguing they were declared goods taxed at 4%, while the respondent claimed they were taxable at 7%. The Tribunal found the notices invalid as they were not issued during an assessment proceeding as required by section 76, ultimately restraining the respondents from enforcing them. Compliance with procedural requirements and accurate application of tax laws were emphasized in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>