https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162424 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the petitioners regarding the notice demanding refund of excess amount under a waiver scheme. It held that the respondents could not unilaterally alter the agreement based on the amended eligibility certificate, citing principles of promissory estoppel. The Tribunal directed the respondents to give notice before implementing changes and clarified that the petitioners were entitled to the benefit only up to the amount already availed under the scheme. One petition was allowed, setting aside the notice demanding payment of the excess amount, while another petition was dismissed. en-us Wed, 04 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:37:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162424 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the petitioners regarding the notice demanding refund of excess amount under a waiver scheme. It held that the respondents could not unilaterally alter the agreement based on the amended eligibility certificate, citing principles of promissory estoppel. The Tribunal directed the respondents to give notice before implementing changes and clarified that the petitioners were entitled to the benefit only up to the amount already availed under the scheme. One petition was allowed, setting aside the notice demanding payment of the excess amount, while another petition was dismissed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 04 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162424