https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162423 Writ petitions challenging show cause notices and proposed reassessment under section 29(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 were found premature because no final reassessment order had yet been passed. The taxpayer had already filed objections, and the statutory authority was still required to examine the facts and law before deciding the matter. As the controversy was only at the threshold stage and an effective statutory remedy remained available, the High Court declined to interfere under article 226. The petitions were therefore held not maintainable at that stage. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:34:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162423 Writ petitions challenging show cause notices and proposed reassessment under section 29(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 were found premature because no final reassessment order had yet been passed. The taxpayer had already filed objections, and the statutory authority was still required to examine the facts and law before deciding the matter. As the controversy was only at the threshold stage and an effective statutory remedy remained available, the High Court declined to interfere under article 226. The petitions were therefore held not maintainable at that stage. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 23 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162423