<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 861 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162407</link>
    <description>Rule 214C of the West Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1995 does not confer power on the Commercial Tax Officer to verify the value of a consignment for transport purposes unless such authority is expressly provided. The comparative scheme of Rule 212 shows that where valuation scrutiny is intended, it is stated in clear terms. On that basis, seizure founded only on alleged undervaluation, supported by a local market inquiry and not by objective lawful satisfaction, is beyond jurisdiction. Goods covered by proper transport documents cannot be detained or subjected to penalty action on mere suspicion of undervaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:27:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 861 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162407</link>
      <description>Rule 214C of the West Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1995 does not confer power on the Commercial Tax Officer to verify the value of a consignment for transport purposes unless such authority is expressly provided. The comparative scheme of Rule 212 shows that where valuation scrutiny is intended, it is stated in clear terms. On that basis, seizure founded only on alleged undervaluation, supported by a local market inquiry and not by objective lawful satisfaction, is beyond jurisdiction. Goods covered by proper transport documents cannot be detained or subjected to penalty action on mere suspicion of undervaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>