https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162405 A writ petition under Article 226 will not ordinarily lie against a show cause notice issued within the statutory domain of the assessing authority where the dispute turns on mixed questions of fact and law. Here, the challenge involved whether transactions relating to trademarks, technical know-how and non-competition agreements constituted a sale of goods and whether the State had jurisdiction on the facts pleaded. Because the assessing authority had not yet considered the replies, the writ court declined to interfere and required the petitioners to pursue their objections before the authority, which had to decide the matter on merits after hearing them. en-us Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:57:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162405 A writ petition under Article 226 will not ordinarily lie against a show cause notice issued within the statutory domain of the assessing authority where the dispute turns on mixed questions of fact and law. Here, the challenge involved whether transactions relating to trademarks, technical know-how and non-competition agreements constituted a sale of goods and whether the State had jurisdiction on the facts pleaded. Because the assessing authority had not yet considered the replies, the writ court declined to interfere and required the petitioners to pursue their objections before the authority, which had to decide the matter on merits after hearing them. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162405