<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 833 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162403</link>
    <description>Movement of tea from Kolkata to Kerala was treated as export-linked movement under pre-existing foreign buyer contracts, not a mere stock transfer, because the record showed the contracts were entered into before the auction purchase and supported by documentary evidence. The objection that no contract existed at Kolkata was rejected on that material. The applicant was therefore entitled to issuance of declaration Form No. 9.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:47:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 833 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162403</link>
      <description>Movement of tea from Kolkata to Kerala was treated as export-linked movement under pre-existing foreign buyer contracts, not a mere stock transfer, because the record showed the contracts were entered into before the auction purchase and supported by documentary evidence. The objection that no contract existed at Kolkata was rejected on that material. The applicant was therefore entitled to issuance of declaration Form No. 9.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>