<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 1274 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162401</link>
    <description>The court held that PVC pipe fitting is not a spare part of a pumping set under entry 12 of Schedule II, as it is used for water supply and not integral to the pumping set&#039;s function. Additionally, the PVC pipe fitting was deemed not an accessory to the pumping set, as it does not enhance the operation of the set. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:48:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 1274 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162401</link>
      <description>The court held that PVC pipe fitting is not a spare part of a pumping set under entry 12 of Schedule II, as it is used for water supply and not integral to the pumping set&#039;s function. Additionally, the PVC pipe fitting was deemed not an accessory to the pumping set, as it does not enhance the operation of the set. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>