<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 749 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162399</link>
    <description>The Court granted the petition seeking a writ of prohibition against the Sales Tax Officer for completing assessment proceedings for the years 1973-74 and 1974-75 under the U.P. Sales Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act. The Sales Tax Officer failed to meet the deadline for reassessment despite the expiration of the limitation period, and the Tribunal&#039;s delay in issuing a stay order further supported the petitioner&#039;s case. Consequently, the High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, reinstated the remand, and stayed the assessment proceedings for both years, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioner without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:43:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 749 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162399</link>
      <description>The Court granted the petition seeking a writ of prohibition against the Sales Tax Officer for completing assessment proceedings for the years 1973-74 and 1974-75 under the U.P. Sales Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act. The Sales Tax Officer failed to meet the deadline for reassessment despite the expiration of the limitation period, and the Tribunal&#039;s delay in issuing a stay order further supported the petitioner&#039;s case. Consequently, the High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, reinstated the remand, and stayed the assessment proceedings for both years, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioner without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>