<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 748 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162398</link>
    <description>Section 4-A of the Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act was upheld because it supplied a clear policy for notifying local areas and specified goods, and it limited executive discretion by a ten per cent ceiling, so it was not treated as unguided or arbitrary under article 14. The enhanced entry tax notification on diesel, furnace oil and hexane imported from outside the State was also upheld because it operated within the entry tax framework, was justified on revenue protection and prevention of misuse, and was not found to impose an impermissible trade restriction or unconstitutional discrimination under articles 19(1)(g), 301, 303 and 304.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 748 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162398</link>
      <description>Section 4-A of the Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act was upheld because it supplied a clear policy for notifying local areas and specified goods, and it limited executive discretion by a ten per cent ceiling, so it was not treated as unguided or arbitrary under article 14. The enhanced entry tax notification on diesel, furnace oil and hexane imported from outside the State was also upheld because it operated within the entry tax framework, was justified on revenue protection and prevention of misuse, and was not found to impose an impermissible trade restriction or unconstitutional discrimination under articles 19(1)(g), 301, 303 and 304.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>