<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1074 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244480</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of factual findings in tax disputes and the limited scope for interference with concurrent findings. The judgment highlights the significance of concrete evidence to support claims, the importance of precedent in determining similar issues, and the principle that an appeal must provide substantial reasoning to challenge a decision effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:12:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1074 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244480</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of factual findings in tax disputes and the limited scope for interference with concurrent findings. The judgment highlights the significance of concrete evidence to support claims, the importance of precedent in determining similar issues, and the principle that an appeal must provide substantial reasoning to challenge a decision effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>