<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1073 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244479</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the reassessment proceedings initiated by the notice dated 30th March 2010 and the order dated 13th December 2011 dismissing the objections to the reopening. The court held that the reassessment was invalid due to a change of opinion and the full and true disclosure of material facts by the petitioner. The court also highlighted the need for improved record maintenance practices by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1073 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244479</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the reassessment proceedings initiated by the notice dated 30th March 2010 and the order dated 13th December 2011 dismissing the objections to the reopening. The court held that the reassessment was invalid due to a change of opinion and the full and true disclosure of material facts by the petitioner. The court also highlighted the need for improved record maintenance practices by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>