<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1062 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not comply with the statutory mandate by merely restoring the issues to the AO without proper findings. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and restored the issues back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision in accordance with the law, ensuring a speaking order is issued after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The appeals of the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1062 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not comply with the statutory mandate by merely restoring the issues to the AO without proper findings. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and restored the issues back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision in accordance with the law, ensuring a speaking order is issued after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The appeals of the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>