<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1061 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244467</link>
    <description>DTA clearances made against Advance Authorisation, where consideration was received in Indian currency, were treated as admissible for Net Foreign Exchange computation and export-obligation fulfilment because the monitoring guidelines included supplies under paragraph 6.9 of Chapter 6 of the Exim Policy. The clause relied on to exclude such clearances had been deleted from the Foreign Trade Policy with effect from 1 April 2006 and was not in force for the relevant period. The record also noted a final exit order for the unit, and no contrary provision was shown to disqualify the supplies. Accordingly, the demands and penalties could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1061 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244467</link>
      <description>DTA clearances made against Advance Authorisation, where consideration was received in Indian currency, were treated as admissible for Net Foreign Exchange computation and export-obligation fulfilment because the monitoring guidelines included supplies under paragraph 6.9 of Chapter 6 of the Exim Policy. The clause relied on to exclude such clearances had been deleted from the Foreign Trade Policy with effect from 1 April 2006 and was not in force for the relevant period. The record also noted a final exit order for the unit, and no contrary provision was shown to disqualify the supplies. Accordingly, the demands and penalties could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>