https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244457 The judgment found the applicant, an EOU engaged in manufacturing and exporting granite products, in contravention of Notification No.23/2003-CE by using duty-free imported raw materials in finished goods cleared in the DTA. The enforcement of the B-17 bond was upheld despite the applicant's argument of positive NFE. The issue of limitation on demand of duty and suppression of facts was acknowledged, with detailed examination deferred to the appeal hearing. The applicant was directed to predeposit a specific amount while staying the recovery of the balance dues during the appeal process, highlighting procedural compliance in challenging duty demands. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244457 The judgment found the applicant, an EOU engaged in manufacturing and exporting granite products, in contravention of Notification No.23/2003-CE by using duty-free imported raw materials in finished goods cleared in the DTA. The enforcement of the B-17 bond was upheld despite the applicant's argument of positive NFE. The issue of limitation on demand of duty and suppression of facts was acknowledged, with detailed examination deferred to the appeal hearing. The applicant was directed to predeposit a specific amount while staying the recovery of the balance dues during the appeal process, highlighting procedural compliance in challenging duty demands. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244457