<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1047 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244453</link>
    <description>Proposed turnover and tax revisions under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were not permitted to be enforced immediately because the dealer&#039;s objections had not yet been properly verified against the audited trial balance and profit and loss account. The Court held that the objections required consideration on the basis of supporting proof and that the dealer had to be given an opportunity to place the relevant documents before further recovery action. The recovery measures were therefore kept in abeyance and the matter was remitted for reconsideration after hearing the dealer and passing fresh orders in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1047 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244453</link>
      <description>Proposed turnover and tax revisions under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were not permitted to be enforced immediately because the dealer&#039;s objections had not yet been properly verified against the audited trial balance and profit and loss account. The Court held that the objections required consideration on the basis of supporting proof and that the dealer had to be given an opportunity to place the relevant documents before further recovery action. The recovery measures were therefore kept in abeyance and the matter was remitted for reconsideration after hearing the dealer and passing fresh orders in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>