<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1045 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244451</link>
    <description>The tribunal waived the pre-deposit condition of penalty as the appellant had paid the confirmed demand and interest but contested only the penalty. The judgment confirmed the taxability of renting immovable property with retrospective effect and set aside the penalty imposed, citing compliance with payment requirements and relevant statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1045 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244451</link>
      <description>The tribunal waived the pre-deposit condition of penalty as the appellant had paid the confirmed demand and interest but contested only the penalty. The judgment confirmed the taxability of renting immovable property with retrospective effect and set aside the penalty imposed, citing compliance with payment requirements and relevant statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>