https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244422 The Tribunal concluded that the grounds for suspension were not sustainable. The appellant was not a habitual offender, and the statement of Shri Vishal Madan could not be relied upon at this stage. Furthermore, the appellant had duly informed the authorities about the inclusion of new directors, and police verification had been conducted. The Tribunal set aside the suspension order and directed the respondent to revoke the suspension of CHA Licence No. 11/273 within 15 days. The Tribunal also allowed the stay application and the application for early hearing. en-us Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244422 The Tribunal concluded that the grounds for suspension were not sustainable. The appellant was not a habitual offender, and the statement of Shri Vishal Madan could not be relied upon at this stage. Furthermore, the appellant had duly informed the authorities about the inclusion of new directors, and police verification had been conducted. The Tribunal set aside the suspension order and directed the respondent to revoke the suspension of CHA Licence No. 11/273 within 15 days. The Tribunal also allowed the stay application and the application for early hearing. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244422