<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 674 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162381</link>
    <description>The court held that the Trade Tax Tribunal has the authority to recall, vary, or modify a stay order at a subsequent stage of proceedings. It found the impugned order was not arbitrary or illegal, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s repeated adjournment requests as a basis for vacating the stay order. Citing relevant case law, the court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s power to take such actions in appropriate cases to prevent abuse of stay orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:59:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 674 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162381</link>
      <description>The court held that the Trade Tax Tribunal has the authority to recall, vary, or modify a stay order at a subsequent stage of proceedings. It found the impugned order was not arbitrary or illegal, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s repeated adjournment requests as a basis for vacating the stay order. Citing relevant case law, the court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s power to take such actions in appropriate cases to prevent abuse of stay orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>