<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 511 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162372</link>
    <description>The court held that the issuance of the sales tax license implied acceptance of the surety bond, aligning with statutory provisions. Emphasizing the importance of formal acceptance of surety bonds and compliance with the law, the court set aside the Additional District Judge&#039;s judgment, restoring the trial court&#039;s decision. As a result, the suit of the plaintiff-respondents was dismissed, and the recovery sought by the defendant-appellant was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:19:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 511 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162372</link>
      <description>The court held that the issuance of the sales tax license implied acceptance of the surety bond, aligning with statutory provisions. Emphasizing the importance of formal acceptance of surety bonds and compliance with the law, the court set aside the Additional District Judge&#039;s judgment, restoring the trial court&#039;s decision. As a result, the suit of the plaintiff-respondents was dismissed, and the recovery sought by the defendant-appellant was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>