<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 546 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162370</link>
    <description>Writ interference with a works contract assessment is unwarranted where the taxable turnover is determined from the assessee&#039;s accounts, statement of claim, and supporting work orders, and not by a mechanical application of Rule 13-A of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983. The record showed that labour and other charges were excluded on the basis of documents actually produced, leaving no gross or patent error in the assessment or revisional order. Adequate opportunity had already been afforded at the appellate and revisional stages, and the availability of an alternate statutory remedy further militated against remand for additional evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:11:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 546 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162370</link>
      <description>Writ interference with a works contract assessment is unwarranted where the taxable turnover is determined from the assessee&#039;s accounts, statement of claim, and supporting work orders, and not by a mechanical application of Rule 13-A of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983. The record showed that labour and other charges were excluded on the basis of documents actually produced, leaving no gross or patent error in the assessment or revisional order. Adequate opportunity had already been afforded at the appellate and revisional stages, and the availability of an alternate statutory remedy further militated against remand for additional evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>