<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 958 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162369</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding usual tax rates for basic drugs, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge. It ruled that the exemption&#039;s benefit is contingent on actual use of basic drugs as raw material for manufacturing medicines, requiring dealers to prove eligibility for the concessional tax rate by demonstrating such use. The court emphasized the significance of each word in the exemption notification and clarified that fulfilling specified conditions is necessary to claim the benefit. The dismissal does not prevent the petitioner from receiving the benefit upon satisfying the exemption&#039;s conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:10:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 958 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162369</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order demanding usual tax rates for basic drugs, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge. It ruled that the exemption&#039;s benefit is contingent on actual use of basic drugs as raw material for manufacturing medicines, requiring dealers to prove eligibility for the concessional tax rate by demonstrating such use. The court emphasized the significance of each word in the exemption notification and clarified that fulfilling specified conditions is necessary to claim the benefit. The dismissal does not prevent the petitioner from receiving the benefit upon satisfying the exemption&#039;s conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>