<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 1059 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162363</link>
    <description>The court addressed a dispute regarding the calculation of sales tax on country liquor, specifically focusing on whether excise duty should be included in the wholesale price for tax assessment. The petitioners challenged a circular letter by the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Commercial Taxes Department, arguing against such inclusion. Despite legal precedents cited by both parties, the court emphasized maintaining the original scope of the writ petitions and did not allow for further expansion or changes. The State Government&#039;s recall of the initially challenged order was noted, but the petitioners persisted in challenging the circular letter on sales tax calculation methodology.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:16:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 1059 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162363</link>
      <description>The court addressed a dispute regarding the calculation of sales tax on country liquor, specifically focusing on whether excise duty should be included in the wholesale price for tax assessment. The petitioners challenged a circular letter by the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Commercial Taxes Department, arguing against such inclusion. Despite legal precedents cited by both parties, the court emphasized maintaining the original scope of the writ petitions and did not allow for further expansion or changes. The State Government&#039;s recall of the initially challenged order was noted, but the petitioners persisted in challenging the circular letter on sales tax calculation methodology.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>