https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162359 The court dismissed the writ petition, finding that the petitioner did not establish financial inability to pay the tax as required under Section 39(5) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. The court emphasized that financial inability refers to incapacity, not legal obstacles. The petitioner's argument regarding legal complications with the Railway Department was rejected, and it was advised to pursue legal remedies against the dismissal of the appeal for non-payment of tax, with the option to pay the tax and seek the appeal's revival. en-us Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:35:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162359 The court dismissed the writ petition, finding that the petitioner did not establish financial inability to pay the tax as required under Section 39(5) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. The court emphasized that financial inability refers to incapacity, not legal obstacles. The petitioner's argument regarding legal complications with the Railway Department was rejected, and it was advised to pursue legal remedies against the dismissal of the appeal for non-payment of tax, with the option to pay the tax and seek the appeal's revival. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 27 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162359